🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has upheld a ban on sending national guard in Portland, Oregon, after a latest legal decision.

Appeals Court Concurs to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on Tuesday that it would rehear the legal dispute concerning the executive power with an expanded group of eleven justices. The judicial body also overturned a earlier ruling from a three-judge panel that had supported the administration.

Legal Saga Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the most recent development in a long-running court case over whether the administration has the legal right and justification to send state military units in the city. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since the end of September when the mobilization attempt was started in due to months of protests.

Differing Viewpoints

The federal government has claimed that government employees at the ICE facility in south Portland were under attack, while local authorities maintain that local officers have control of the circumstances.

Contrary to characterizations of Portland as “war ravaged”, residents have been sharing videos of lush hiking trails and a vibrant culinary culture, and planning events such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Recent Legal Actions

The appeals court decision came after a federal judge in Portland enacted two legal injunctions this period – one preventing the federalization of the state troops, and another stopping the deployment of any national guard troops in Oregon, after efforts to circumvent the initial injunction by calling up troops from California.

On the previous day, the ninth circuit panel had temporarily suspended the initial decision – permitting command of 200 Oregon national guard – but the second ruling stayed effective, blocking the actual deployment of the forces.

Full Panel Consideration

The Tuesday decision means the issue will be heard “en banc” – with both rulings under consideration together – by a group of eleven justices.

“This decision demonstrates that facts are important and that the judicial system are striving to hold this administration accountable. The founding document limits the executive authority, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a testing site for expansive government power,” stated the state attorney general in a official comment.

“The judicial body is sending a clear message: the executive leader cannot send the armed forces into US cities without cause. We will continue protecting Oregon’s laws, values, and autonomy as this legal proceeding moves forward and our legal battle continues in the courts.”